There's an interesting article in Time Magazine about Hamilton County being a key make-or-break county for the presidential election: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1855354,00.html.
Speaking of Hamilton County, any political junkies want to make predictions? Go ahead and post the percentages you predict for the following elections, in Hamilton County. I will post them all. The person who gets the closest will win a free T-shirt, and much respect!
1. President: Obama-McCain
2. Commissioner 1: Portune-Rothenberg
3. Commissioner 2: Dole-Hartman
4. Treasurer: Brinker-Goering
5. Clerk of Courts: Good-Clancy
6. County Recorder: Coates-Groppe
7. Common Pleas Judge: Holt-Davis - Dewine
8. Common Pleas Judge: Luebbers-Mock
9. Common Pleas Judge: Metz-Nelson
10. Congress (1): Driehaus-Chabot (percentage in whole district -- not just Ham Co)
11. Congress (2): Wulsin-Krikorian-Schmidt (same)
12. Ohio House 28: Pillich-Lovitt
13. State Issue 6, Casino (in Hamilton County): For-Against
14. Issue 8 (Cincinnati, Proportional Representation): For-Against
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
1. President: Obama-McCain OBAMA 55/45
2. Commissioner 1: Portune- PORTUNE 65/35 Rothenberg
3. Commissioner 2: Dole-Hartman HARTMAN 55/45
4. Treasurer: Brinker-Goering GOERING 55/45
5. Clerk of Courts: Good-Clancy GOOD 51/49
6. Common Pleas Judge: Holt-Davis - Dewine DEWINE 51/49
7. Common Pleas Judge: Luebbers-Mock Luebbers 56/44
8. Congress (1): Driehaus-Chabot (percentage in whole district -- not just Ham Co)Chabot 51/49
9. Congress (2): Wulsin-Krikorian-Schmidt (same) Schmidt 51/49
10. Ohio House 28: Pillich-Lovitt
LOVITT 53/47
11. State Issue 6, Casino (in Hamilton County): For-Against
Against 60/40
12. Issue 8 (Cincinnati, Proportional Representation): For-Against AGAINST 55/45
ORMSBEE
1)President - Obama (rout)
2)Commissioner 1 - Portune
3)Commissioner 2 - Hartmann
4)Treasurer - Goering
5)Clerk of Courts - Good (close)
6)Common Pleas Judge - DeWine
7)Common Pleas Judge - Luebbers (very close)
8)Congress District 1 - Chabot (not as close as you'd think)
9)Congress District 2 - Schmidt
10)Ohio House 28 - Pillich
11)Ohio Issue 6 - For
Good topic David- Just curious what people think on a few things:
1) Who will the "deal" hurt more, Portune or Hartmann, and why?
2) Will Portune's commercials for Brinker & Davis put them over the top? Is it payback for Todd against Goering & DeWine for opposing the jail tax.
3) If Driehaus can't beat Chabot can anyone?
4) Who does Krikorian hurt more, Schmidt or Wulsin? Can he be the difference maker in this race?
5) Did Jim Raussen see the writing on the wall and get out at just the right time?
Predictions, not wishes!
1. President: Obama-McCain OBAMA 339 to McCain 199
2. Commissioner 1: Portune-Rothenberg PORTUNE 65/35
3. Commissioner 2: Dole-Hartman HARTMAN 57/43
4. Treasurer: Brinker-Goering GOERING
5. Clerk of Courts: Good-Clancy CLANCY
6. County Recorder: Coates-Groppe GROPPE
7. Common Pleas Judge: Holt-Davis - Dewine DEWINE
8. Common Pleas Judge: Luebbers-Mock LUEBBERS
9. Common Pleas Judge: Metz-Nelson NELSON
10. Congress (1): Driehaus-Chabot (percentage in whole district -- not just Ham Co)DRIEHAUS 50.5/49.5
11. Congress (2): Wulsin-Krikorian-Schmidt (same)SCHMIDT 49/48/3
12. Ohio House 28: Pillich-Lovitt PILLICH
13. State Issue 6, Casino (in Hamilton County): For-Against AGAINST
14. Issue 8 (Cincinnati, Proportional Representation): For-Against AGAINST
1. President: Obama(330) at 62%-McCain(208)
2. Commissioner 1: Portune at 81% -Rothenberg
3. Commissioner 2: Dole-Hartman at only 52%
4. Treasurer: Brinker at 53%-Goering
5. Clerk of Courts: Good at 51%-Clancy
6. County Recorder: Coates-Groppe at 61%
7. Common Pleas Judge: Holt-Davis at 57% - Dewine
8. Common Pleas Judge: Luebbers at 58%-Mock
9. Common Pleas Judge: Metz at 53%-Nelson
10. Congress (1): Driehaus at 58%-Chabot (percentage in whole district -- not just Ham Co)
11. Congress (2): Wulsin at 45%-Krikorian-Schmidt (same)
12. Ohio House 28: Pillich at 60%-Lovitt
13. State Issue 6, Casino (in Hamilton County): For-Against at 53%
14. Issue 8 (Cincinnati, Proportional Representation): For at 51%-Against
Junkie #6
Post a Comment