For the past year, Todd Portune and I have been very clear on one goal--given the taxpayer investment in Paul Brown Stadium, we want to see the stadium used far more than 10 times a year for football games. It's a community asset, and should be used as such.
We are pursuing this goal in numerous ways, but today we have an exciting announcement--local star Heather Mitts and the gold-medal winning U.S. Women's Soccer Team will play a game here next month.
To quote the press release:
"CHICAGO (October 7, 2008) – The gold medal-winning U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team will continue its Achieve Your Gold Tour at Paul Brown Stadium vs. South Korea on Nov. 5 at 7:30 p.m. ET.
The U.S. will be visiting the hometown of U.S. defender Heather Mitts, who has 91 caps for the USA and started all six games in China, for the second time. The U.S. also passed through Cincinnati on the 2004 Victory Tour to celebrate the gold medal in Athens, Greece.
The tour, which is taking the Olympic champions across the USA to celebrate its historic run to the top of the podium in Beijing, also announced stops in Richmond, Va., on Nov. 1 and Tampa, Fla., on Nov. 8.
Tickets go on sale Sunday, Oct. 12, at 10 a.m. ET at ussoccer.com, by phone at 513-562-4949 and at all Cincinnati-area Ticketmaster ticket centers. Groups of 20 or more can obtain an order form at ussoccer.com or call 312-528-1290."
So come out and watch a Cincinnati-born and -raised superstar play in her hometown!
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Windstorm Survey Results -- Surprising
Since people from across the County and region had such individualized experiences over the course of September's windstorm, I expected results to be all over the map. But still, the results (out of 138 responses) surprised me.
Question 1: 42.7% said the windstorm was an inconvenience, 20.2% said it had a major impact on them and 26.6% said it was in between a major impact and an inconvenience. Only 10% said it was less than an inconvenience, or had no impact at all.
Question 2: Almost 2/3s of respondents lost power for two days or more. About 1/3 lost it for 4 days ore more. 15% lost it for more than 5 days.
Question 3 and 4: About 60% suffered damage beyond losing power, and 69% threw out their food.
Question 5: Most people kept up about the storm through the radio, and word of mouth (53% each). Perhaps not suprisingly due to the blackout, television, the internet and government briefings were significantly lower (24.2%, 21.1%, 4.7%).
Question 6: As to communication about the storm, you ranked the institutions in the following order: media (2.91 out of 5); government (2.68); law enforcement (2.62); health department (2.53); Duke Energy (2.47); Time Warner Cable (1.97).
Question 7: As to the overall response to the storm, you ranked the institutions in the following order: Duke Energy and law enforcement (each with 3.36); government (County/municipality) (3.30); health departments (3.12); Time Warner (2.53).
Given all the attention on Duke Energy, here is the breakdown on the rating of their response, on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being outstanding, 1 being very poor):
1 -- 15.3%
2 -- 13.7%
3 -- 18.3%
4 -- 23.7%
5 -- 28.2%
Substantive comments:
Your substantive comments were incredibly helpful. The majority of people were understanding of the difficult circumstances, and their number one frustration was simply wanting better communication of when they might get the help they need, and get their power back. Others wondered why there wasn't a better, more transparent prediction of the storm, so they could have prepared.
Almost all agreed we need to be better equipped and prepared for the "next one."
And most people said they will themselves be better prepared: having emergency kits, back-up batteries, nonperishable foods, buying generators, batter radios, and water.
Thanks again for taking this survey. I will pass all these results along to the relevant entities as we together assess how to do better next time.
Question 1: 42.7% said the windstorm was an inconvenience, 20.2% said it had a major impact on them and 26.6% said it was in between a major impact and an inconvenience. Only 10% said it was less than an inconvenience, or had no impact at all.
Question 2: Almost 2/3s of respondents lost power for two days or more. About 1/3 lost it for 4 days ore more. 15% lost it for more than 5 days.
Question 3 and 4: About 60% suffered damage beyond losing power, and 69% threw out their food.
Question 5: Most people kept up about the storm through the radio, and word of mouth (53% each). Perhaps not suprisingly due to the blackout, television, the internet and government briefings were significantly lower (24.2%, 21.1%, 4.7%).
Question 6: As to communication about the storm, you ranked the institutions in the following order: media (2.91 out of 5); government (2.68); law enforcement (2.62); health department (2.53); Duke Energy (2.47); Time Warner Cable (1.97).
Question 7: As to the overall response to the storm, you ranked the institutions in the following order: Duke Energy and law enforcement (each with 3.36); government (County/municipality) (3.30); health departments (3.12); Time Warner (2.53).
Given all the attention on Duke Energy, here is the breakdown on the rating of their response, on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being outstanding, 1 being very poor):
1 -- 15.3%
2 -- 13.7%
3 -- 18.3%
4 -- 23.7%
5 -- 28.2%
Substantive comments:
Your substantive comments were incredibly helpful. The majority of people were understanding of the difficult circumstances, and their number one frustration was simply wanting better communication of when they might get the help they need, and get their power back. Others wondered why there wasn't a better, more transparent prediction of the storm, so they could have prepared.
Almost all agreed we need to be better equipped and prepared for the "next one."
And most people said they will themselves be better prepared: having emergency kits, back-up batteries, nonperishable foods, buying generators, batter radios, and water.
Thanks again for taking this survey. I will pass all these results along to the relevant entities as we together assess how to do better next time.
Monday, October 6, 2008
The "Ultimate Bridge to Nowhere"?
Sadly, the politics of the Presidential election seem to be degenerating every day that goes by. But I'm a firm believer that substance and policy still matter.
One of the starkest differences out there is the candidates' approach to health care. Lost in the play-by-play commentary about who won last Thursday's debate, I think Joe Biden turned a lot of heads when he described the way that the McCain health care proposal would work.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/10/03/vp-debate-mccains-healthcare-plan-is-the-real-bridge-to-nowhere/
As Biden described it, the plan essentially increases taxes (by taxing health benefits as compensation) while pushing a lot of employers out of the health benefit business, leaving employees to find health care themselves with a $5,000 tax credit. This was news to a lot of viewers and voters. Gov. Palin didn't rebut Biden's basic claim, and I haven't found any commentary that rebuts that this is in fact what McCain is proposing.
Today, Paul Krugman commented on it:
'http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/opinion/06krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
To give a counterview, here's an article by the Cato Institute defending the plan:
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9380
I find the proposal to be deeply worrisome. I'd love to hear other thoughts. And if you support the McCain plan, I'd love to hear your thoughts on why you do.
Either way, if McCain is serious about a proposal this dramatic, it's something every voter should know about as they enter the voting booth (or mail in their ballot).
Today is the last day to register in Ohio, by the way.
One of the starkest differences out there is the candidates' approach to health care. Lost in the play-by-play commentary about who won last Thursday's debate, I think Joe Biden turned a lot of heads when he described the way that the McCain health care proposal would work.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/10/03/vp-debate-mccains-healthcare-plan-is-the-real-bridge-to-nowhere/
As Biden described it, the plan essentially increases taxes (by taxing health benefits as compensation) while pushing a lot of employers out of the health benefit business, leaving employees to find health care themselves with a $5,000 tax credit. This was news to a lot of viewers and voters. Gov. Palin didn't rebut Biden's basic claim, and I haven't found any commentary that rebuts that this is in fact what McCain is proposing.
Today, Paul Krugman commented on it:
'http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/opinion/06krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
To give a counterview, here's an article by the Cato Institute defending the plan:
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9380
I find the proposal to be deeply worrisome. I'd love to hear other thoughts. And if you support the McCain plan, I'd love to hear your thoughts on why you do.
Either way, if McCain is serious about a proposal this dramatic, it's something every voter should know about as they enter the voting booth (or mail in their ballot).
Today is the last day to register in Ohio, by the way.
Friday, October 3, 2008
Cincinnati Must-See TV
For those who haven't seen it, this was incredible publicity for Cincinnati that was recently aired nationwide. These are only a few snippets of what was a non-stop PR bonanza. Thanks to all involved for making this happen . . . .
http://www.metaphorinteractive.com/vh1cincinnati/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca_2f3shkDE&feature=user
http://www.metaphorinteractive.com/vh1cincinnati/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca_2f3shkDE&feature=user
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Positive Developments in a Tough Time
Believe it or not, several very positive developments recently occurred on key County priorities:
$8M To Abate Blight Caused by Foreclosures
First, we recently learned the great news that due to the recently passed Housing Bill in DC, Hamilton County will be receiving close to $8M in federal funds that will allow us to redevelop blighted, foreclosed properties in jurisdictions across the County. (The City received about the same amount for its neighborhoods).
http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081001/NEWS01/810010318
While we had expected some dollars, this was definitely far more than I had expected.
Practically speaking, these dollars will allow us, working in partnership with those communities that are seeing the highest numbers of foreclosures, to eliminate the blight that those foreclosures are causing, which erode the value and quality of life of the surrounding neighborhood. We can invest to either demolish or rehabilitate blighted properties--and in the case of demolition, we can then invest to create greenspace, or new commercial or residential development opportunities.
Last week, anticipating that these dollars are coming, we called together leaders from the highest foreclosure communities to seek their initial input on how these dollars can be allocated to be most helpful to their needs, and we are reviewing the many guidelines and regulations that will instruct how the funds can be spent.
By December 1, guided by that input, we will submit our community plan to the federal government. Overall, this is a huge opportunity for many communities.
(Of course, our top priority continues to be to prevent foreclosures in the first place through our Homeowner Preservation efforts.)
Treating the Mentally Ill in Our Criminal Justice System
Second, like our drug court (see discussion in blog below), one of the more positive reforms in the County Courthouse in recent years has been the creation of the Mental Health Docket at the misdemeanor level.
This approach, led by Judges Stautberg and Allen, allows us to pay special attention to those arrested for nonviolent offenses who suffer from substantial mental illness. Rather than simply locking these folks up for a short time, ignoring their underlying mental illness, and seeing them reoffend a short time after release due once again to their untreated illness, the mental health docket has provided a great way to intervene and get them the help they need. It will reduce recidivism, and reduce the costs of our criminal justice system.
So far, this specialized approach has only been in place at the Municipal Court level. The Criminal Justice Commission has been clear that some type of specialized attention to those with mental illnesses should also be available at the Common Pleas level, as it is in other counties.
And here's where the good news comes in--the Health Foundation recently awarded the County a $75,000 planning grant to study and propose a comprehensive and concentrated effort to respond to those with mental illnesses at the Common Pleas level. This process should lead to a concrete plan by mid-2009 as to how we can apply best practices from across the country, as well as what we've learned here, to make sure we have a cutting-edge, safe and smart approach to dealing with mentally ill inmates at the Common Pleas level.
Thanks to all those involved in securing this grant, first and foremost the Health Foundation, and thanks to Judge West for leading the effort in the coming months.
$8M To Abate Blight Caused by Foreclosures
First, we recently learned the great news that due to the recently passed Housing Bill in DC, Hamilton County will be receiving close to $8M in federal funds that will allow us to redevelop blighted, foreclosed properties in jurisdictions across the County. (The City received about the same amount for its neighborhoods).
http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081001/NEWS01/810010318
While we had expected some dollars, this was definitely far more than I had expected.
Practically speaking, these dollars will allow us, working in partnership with those communities that are seeing the highest numbers of foreclosures, to eliminate the blight that those foreclosures are causing, which erode the value and quality of life of the surrounding neighborhood. We can invest to either demolish or rehabilitate blighted properties--and in the case of demolition, we can then invest to create greenspace, or new commercial or residential development opportunities.
Last week, anticipating that these dollars are coming, we called together leaders from the highest foreclosure communities to seek their initial input on how these dollars can be allocated to be most helpful to their needs, and we are reviewing the many guidelines and regulations that will instruct how the funds can be spent.
By December 1, guided by that input, we will submit our community plan to the federal government. Overall, this is a huge opportunity for many communities.
(Of course, our top priority continues to be to prevent foreclosures in the first place through our Homeowner Preservation efforts.)
Treating the Mentally Ill in Our Criminal Justice System
Second, like our drug court (see discussion in blog below), one of the more positive reforms in the County Courthouse in recent years has been the creation of the Mental Health Docket at the misdemeanor level.
This approach, led by Judges Stautberg and Allen, allows us to pay special attention to those arrested for nonviolent offenses who suffer from substantial mental illness. Rather than simply locking these folks up for a short time, ignoring their underlying mental illness, and seeing them reoffend a short time after release due once again to their untreated illness, the mental health docket has provided a great way to intervene and get them the help they need. It will reduce recidivism, and reduce the costs of our criminal justice system.
So far, this specialized approach has only been in place at the Municipal Court level. The Criminal Justice Commission has been clear that some type of specialized attention to those with mental illnesses should also be available at the Common Pleas level, as it is in other counties.
And here's where the good news comes in--the Health Foundation recently awarded the County a $75,000 planning grant to study and propose a comprehensive and concentrated effort to respond to those with mental illnesses at the Common Pleas level. This process should lead to a concrete plan by mid-2009 as to how we can apply best practices from across the country, as well as what we've learned here, to make sure we have a cutting-edge, safe and smart approach to dealing with mentally ill inmates at the Common Pleas level.
Thanks to all those involved in securing this grant, first and foremost the Health Foundation, and thanks to Judge West for leading the effort in the coming months.
Upcoming Windstorm Forums with Duke Energy
I received some incredibly thoughtful and helpful feedback to my recent windstorm survey, and will post it soon.
In the meantime, Duke Energy is seeking direct input from citizens on their response.
Here's the memo I received today:
"On September 14, 2008, a historic wind storm from the remnants of Hurricane Ike struck the entire Greater Cincinnati area, carrying hurricane force winds that included three bursts in excess of 70 miles per hour. The unprecedented winds brought widespread damage especially to trees and power lines.
More than 780,000 customers, or 90 percent, were out of service after the storm with many being out more than once. Nearly 11,000 cases of damage were reported and addressed. This was the largest outage event in the history of the company’s Ohio/Kentucky service area.
Currently, all of our departments involved in storm restoration are going through a lessons learned process to improve our future storm response. In addition, we are reaching out to our customers to share our restoration and prioritization process and learn how we could improve our communications during restoration. We want to provide customers the opportunity to share with us how we can improve our communication process with them.
We have scheduled two community information sessions to discuss our windstorm restoration process and gain valuable feedback on improving our customer communications. We hope you will share the location, date and times of these meetings with your residents.
Thursday, October 2, 2008, 5:30 – 6:30 p.m. – Oasis Conference Center, 902 Loveland-Miamiville Road, Loveland, OH 45140
Monday, October 6, 2008, 5:30 – 6:30 p.m. – Forest Park Senior Center, 11555 Winton Road, Forest Park, OH 45240"
If you want a chance to ask questions or make suggestions directly to Duke, this is a great opportunity.
In the meantime, Duke Energy is seeking direct input from citizens on their response.
Here's the memo I received today:
"On September 14, 2008, a historic wind storm from the remnants of Hurricane Ike struck the entire Greater Cincinnati area, carrying hurricane force winds that included three bursts in excess of 70 miles per hour. The unprecedented winds brought widespread damage especially to trees and power lines.
More than 780,000 customers, or 90 percent, were out of service after the storm with many being out more than once. Nearly 11,000 cases of damage were reported and addressed. This was the largest outage event in the history of the company’s Ohio/Kentucky service area.
Currently, all of our departments involved in storm restoration are going through a lessons learned process to improve our future storm response. In addition, we are reaching out to our customers to share our restoration and prioritization process and learn how we could improve our communications during restoration. We want to provide customers the opportunity to share with us how we can improve our communication process with them.
We have scheduled two community information sessions to discuss our windstorm restoration process and gain valuable feedback on improving our customer communications. We hope you will share the location, date and times of these meetings with your residents.
Thursday, October 2, 2008, 5:30 – 6:30 p.m. – Oasis Conference Center, 902 Loveland-Miamiville Road, Loveland, OH 45140
Monday, October 6, 2008, 5:30 – 6:30 p.m. – Forest Park Senior Center, 11555 Winton Road, Forest Park, OH 45240"
If you want a chance to ask questions or make suggestions directly to Duke, this is a great opportunity.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Gloomy Times: Where's the Leadership?
Yesterday, as I watched the goings on in D.C. and the plummeting of the Dow, in addition to the same gloom so many others are feeling from the impact on businesses and families across our country (not to mention the dramatic local effects this may all have, which really scares me), I felt another feeling: embarassment.
Total embarassment for what has become the ugly and completely dysfunctional "profession" of politics.
What did we see yesterday on Capitol Hill? Fingerpointing. Lack of trust. Running for cover and flimsy excuses justifying votes. Dueling press conferences posturing and blaming one another.
Unnecessary and reckless partisan rhetoric when what we really needed--just once--was a little good faith unity to get through this and come up with a solution a majority can agree on. Campaign after we solve this crisis, not as it's unfolding!
Egos run amok. This morning, one Republican Congressman said that yesterday's vote was about teaching Henry Paulsen a badly needed "civics lesson" because he had seemed arrogant. Very sound reasoning at a time like this.
So few willing to step up and be true leaders. Maybe worse, so few able to do so because the collective credibility of DC starts out at such a low level to begin with, and because things have become so polarized and broken that so few listen to each other in the first place. (http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1845655,00.html)
People voting "no" out of political preservation, without having said a peep over the last week, and not having made any constructive efforts to actually propose or ask for solutions they could live with. (If you don't like something, get in the mix and work to improve it--don't just vote no, make a statement, leave town, and think you've done your job).
Politicians more concerned about how to use this crisis for their own political ends rather than how to actually solve it.
Leaving D.C. en masse for a few days as if this economic crisis is going to take a timeout!
The following story walks through the leadership failures from all sides: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/business/30assess.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
This is crunch time. Our Congresspeople each take an oath to look out for the best interests of this country and its citizens. They each make $169,000 per year to do the public's work. They are not simply elected to get re-elected, but it seems that for too many, that's about all they spend their worrying about. That, and tallying results from phone calls and emails so they can determine how they should vote on issues. (If I voted in that way in the political jobs I've had, Fountain Square would still be the underused and stale place it was six years ago, and all the new restaurants surrounding it would be elsewhere).
While we all tolerate (more than we should) a lot of political bickering, posturing and rhetoric at less troubled times, we at the very least expect the short-sighted politics to take a timeout, and the grownups to get serious, at the tough, critical times. Which was why the petty antics and dysfunction of yesterday were so startling. We looked for leadership, and we found ourselves staring into an abyss.
Make no mistake. This is a complicated problem, and no solutions are going to be simple, wildly popular, or risk-free. Constructive opposition and bipartisan negotiations over the past week improved the original proposal greatly, and hopefully the deal can be further improved in the next couple days.
But outside of the details themselves, if we don't see different and vastly improved leadership emerge in the next couple of days from those in Congress, we will all pay a steep price for a long time. And that price will most certainly be borne along Main St.--as well as Vine, Walnut, Reading, Beechmont, and Harrison, not to mention along our riverfront.
UPDATE: columns that make a similar point:
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/30/a-deepening-leadesrhip-crisis/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/30/AR2008093002319.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
This quote from Tom Friedman also sums it up nicely:
"I always said to myself: Our government is so broken that it can only work in response to a huge crisis. But now we’ve had a huge crisis, and the system still doesn’t seem to work. Our leaders, Republicans and Democrats, have gotten so out of practice of working together that even in the face of this system-threatening meltdown they could not agree on a rescue package, as if they lived on Mars and were just visiting us for the week, with no stake in the outcome. "
Total embarassment for what has become the ugly and completely dysfunctional "profession" of politics.
What did we see yesterday on Capitol Hill? Fingerpointing. Lack of trust. Running for cover and flimsy excuses justifying votes. Dueling press conferences posturing and blaming one another.
Unnecessary and reckless partisan rhetoric when what we really needed--just once--was a little good faith unity to get through this and come up with a solution a majority can agree on. Campaign after we solve this crisis, not as it's unfolding!
Egos run amok. This morning, one Republican Congressman said that yesterday's vote was about teaching Henry Paulsen a badly needed "civics lesson" because he had seemed arrogant. Very sound reasoning at a time like this.
So few willing to step up and be true leaders. Maybe worse, so few able to do so because the collective credibility of DC starts out at such a low level to begin with, and because things have become so polarized and broken that so few listen to each other in the first place. (http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1845655,00.html)
People voting "no" out of political preservation, without having said a peep over the last week, and not having made any constructive efforts to actually propose or ask for solutions they could live with. (If you don't like something, get in the mix and work to improve it--don't just vote no, make a statement, leave town, and think you've done your job).
Politicians more concerned about how to use this crisis for their own political ends rather than how to actually solve it.
Leaving D.C. en masse for a few days as if this economic crisis is going to take a timeout!
The following story walks through the leadership failures from all sides: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/business/30assess.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
This is crunch time. Our Congresspeople each take an oath to look out for the best interests of this country and its citizens. They each make $169,000 per year to do the public's work. They are not simply elected to get re-elected, but it seems that for too many, that's about all they spend their worrying about. That, and tallying results from phone calls and emails so they can determine how they should vote on issues. (If I voted in that way in the political jobs I've had, Fountain Square would still be the underused and stale place it was six years ago, and all the new restaurants surrounding it would be elsewhere).
While we all tolerate (more than we should) a lot of political bickering, posturing and rhetoric at less troubled times, we at the very least expect the short-sighted politics to take a timeout, and the grownups to get serious, at the tough, critical times. Which was why the petty antics and dysfunction of yesterday were so startling. We looked for leadership, and we found ourselves staring into an abyss.
Make no mistake. This is a complicated problem, and no solutions are going to be simple, wildly popular, or risk-free. Constructive opposition and bipartisan negotiations over the past week improved the original proposal greatly, and hopefully the deal can be further improved in the next couple days.
But outside of the details themselves, if we don't see different and vastly improved leadership emerge in the next couple of days from those in Congress, we will all pay a steep price for a long time. And that price will most certainly be borne along Main St.--as well as Vine, Walnut, Reading, Beechmont, and Harrison, not to mention along our riverfront.
UPDATE: columns that make a similar point:
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/30/a-deepening-leadesrhip-crisis/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/30/AR2008093002319.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
This quote from Tom Friedman also sums it up nicely:
"I always said to myself: Our government is so broken that it can only work in response to a huge crisis. But now we’ve had a huge crisis, and the system still doesn’t seem to work. Our leaders, Republicans and Democrats, have gotten so out of practice of working together that even in the face of this system-threatening meltdown they could not agree on a rescue package, as if they lived on Mars and were just visiting us for the week, with no stake in the outcome. "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
